Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/459: use xfs_freeze instead of fsfreeze

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:50:04PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:01 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 08:49:49AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >>> This is what all other tests use as well as _require_freeze
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> [...]
> >>
> >> Shouldn't these all be converted to XFS_FREEZE_PROG w/ a setup call
> >> to export XFS_FREEZE_PROG="`set_prog_path xfs_freeze`"?
> >>
> >
> > Yeh, I suppose I can take this one as part of the "freeze" cleanup.
> >
> 
> I looked again and xfs_freeze pattern repeats itself quite often with
> other xfs_* progs, so I guess I'll leave that cleanup for another time...

No worries, just add it to the pile...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux