Re: [PATCH 2/2] fstests: use _scratch_mount_nocheck where appropriate in tests

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:58:48AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Also remove redundant status checks of _scratch_mount.
> 
> Is there any correlation between tests that need to use _scratch_mount_nocheck
> tests which _require_scratch_nocheck that could make some of these annotations
> automatic?

No, they have totally different meanings. _require_scratch_nocheck means
don't do filesystem check after test, and _scratch_mount_nocheck means
don't check mount status.

Perhaps it's just badly named, I can follow Andreas's suggestion to name
it as _try_scratch_mount or similar names.

Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux