Re: False lockdep completion splats with loop device

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



Let me ask a potentially stupid question, Can someone give an example
of the problem this completion lockdep is actually trying to *catch*.
The lockdep message is sufficiently confusing it's not even clear what
*good* it is in the first place.

Is there an example of a bug that this lockdep feature hasf actually
caught in real life, as opposed to false positives?

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux