Re: [PATCH] Fstest: btrfs/151: test if device delete ends up with losing raid profile

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]




On 13.10.2017 21:08, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:06:57PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 11:39:21AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
>>> Currently running 'btrfs device delete' can end up with losing data raid
>>> profile (if any), this test is to reproduce the problem.
>>>
>>> The fix is
>>>      "Btrfs: avoid losing data raid profile when deleting a device"
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  tests/btrfs/151     | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  tests/btrfs/151.out |  2 ++
>>>  tests/btrfs/group   |  1 +
>>>  3 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/151
>>>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/151.out
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/151 b/tests/btrfs/151
>>> new file mode 100755
>>> index 0000000..1866cb6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/151
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
>>> +#! /bin/bash
>>> +# FS QA Test 151
>>> +#
>>> +# Test if it's losing data chunk's raid profile after 'btrfs device
>>> +# remove'.
>>> +#
>>> +# The fix is
>>> +#	Btrfs: avoid losing data raid profile when deleting a device
>>> +#
>>> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> +# Copyright (c) 2017 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
>>> +#
>>> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>>> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>> +#
>>> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
>>> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>>> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
>>> +#
>>> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
>>> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
>>> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> +#
>>> +
>>> +seq=`basename $0`
>>> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>>> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
>>> +
>>> +here=`pwd`
>>> +tmp=/tmp/$$
>>> +status=1	# failure is the default!
>>> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>>> +
>>> +_cleanup()
>>> +{
>>> +	cd /
>>> +	rm -f $tmp.*
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>>> +. ./common/rc
>>> +. ./common/filter
>>> +
>>> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
>>> +rm -f $seqres.full
>>> +
>>> +# real QA test starts here
>>> +
>>> +# Modify as appropriate.
>>> +_supported_fs btrfs
>>> +_supported_os Linux
>>> +_require_scratch
>>
>> Better to have _require_btrfs_dev_del_by_devid too.
>>
> 
> OK.
> 
>>> +_require_scratch_dev_pool 3
>>
>> Hmm, this only reproduces for me if I have exact three devices in
>> SCRATCH_DEV_POOL, large dev pool passed the test. If this can only be
>> reproduced with a three-device setup, I think we need to limit the dev
>> pool size to at most 3, e.g.
>>
>> # <comments about why we need exact 3 devices>
>> _scratch_dev_pool_get 3
>> <do test here>
>> _scratch_dev_pool_put
>> status=0
>> exit
> 
> Oops, you're totally right.
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +# create raid1 for data
>>> +_scratch_pool_mkfs "-d raid1 -b 1G" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>>> +
>>> +# we need an empty data chunk, so nospace_cache is required.
>>> +_scratch_mount -onospace_cache
>>> +
>>> +# if data chunk is empty, 'btrfs device remove' can change raid1 to
>>> +# single.
>>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device delete 2 $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
>>> +
>>> +df_ret=`$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem df $SCRATCH_MNT`
>>> +echo $df_ret | $AWK_PROG -F ':' '/Data,/ {print $1}'
>>
>> I'd like to avoid saving outputs in a variable, it's easy to cause
>> subtle problems without proper quoting, as Dave found out in this thread
>>
>> [whacky issue] xfs/277 endlessly looping in _require_xfs_io_command
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg07501.html
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> # save btrfs filesystem df output for debug purpose
>> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem df $SCRATCH_MNT >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem df $SCRATCH_MNT | \
>> 	$AWK_PROG -F ':' '/Data,/ {print $1}'
> 
> That makes sense to me, will update it.

Also instead of invoking fi df twice and running the risk of something
changing (you never know), how about using tee?

> 
> Thanks for the comments.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -liubo
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eryu
>>
>>> +
>>> +# success, all done
>>> +status=0
>>> +exit
>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/151.out b/tests/btrfs/151.out
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..0a1de06
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/151.out
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>>> +QA output created by 151
>>> +Data, RAID1
>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
>>> index e73bb1b..a7ff7b0 100644
>>> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
>>> @@ -153,3 +153,4 @@
>>>  148 auto quick rw
>>>  149 auto quick send compress
>>>  150 auto quick dangerous
>>> +151 auto quick
>>> -- 
>>> 2.5.0
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux