> > > > May I ask what's the 'official' purpose of auto group? I agree of adding it to > > fuzzers, but 'auto' group sounds to me like a group of tests being run by > > default, which wouldn't be a good idea in this case. > > I found one email I sent before that explained the auto group > definition, I copied & pasted it here: > > " > I searched for Dave's explainations on 'auto' group in his reviews, and > got the following definitions: > > - it should be a valid & reliable test (it's finished and have > deterministic output) [1] > - it passes on current upstream kernels, if it fails, it's likely to be > resolved in forseeable future [2] > - it should take no longer than 5 minutes to finish [3] > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg00938.html > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg01548.html > [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg01719.html > " > > So I think it's a good 'auto' test :) > Sounds fair :) thanks I don't remember to have seen it before > Thanks, > Eryu -- Carlos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
