On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:01:13AM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > The installation of these extended output files are skipped > because they aren't matched by xfstests. So we rename them > to adapt building rules. > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This patch is 2.4M in size, no wonder it didn't hit the list.. (cc linux-xfs list for these xfs specific tests) > --- > tests/xfs/018 | 8 +- > tests/xfs/018.op.irix | 5628 --------------------------------- > tests/xfs/018.op.linux | 4714 --------------------------- > tests/xfs/018.out.irix | 5628 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/018.out.linux | 4714 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/018.out.trans_buf | 1821 +++++++++++ > tests/xfs/018.out.trans_inode | 2609 +++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/018.trans_buf | 1821 ----------- > tests/xfs/018.trans_inode | 2609 --------------- xfs/018 081 and 082 are all marked as 'deprecated', I'm wondering if we can just remove them. > tests/xfs/040 | 4 +- > tests/xfs/040.good | 16 - > tests/xfs/040.out.good | 16 + xfs/040 is doing source code diff between userspace vs kernel space, I'm not sure if this is still needed. But xfs/040 requires KWORKAREA points to a directory that contains both userspace and kernel code, I suspect it's rarely run. > tests/xfs/081 | 2 +- > tests/xfs/081.out.ugquota.trans_inode | 3091 ++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/081.ugquota.trans_inode | 3091 ------------------ > tests/xfs/082 | 8 +- > tests/xfs/082.op.irix | 5628 --------------------------------- > tests/xfs/082.op.linux | 4714 --------------------------- > tests/xfs/082.out.irix | 5628 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/082.out.linux | 4714 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/082.out.trans_buf | 1821 +++++++++++ > tests/xfs/082.out.trans_inode | 2609 +++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/082.trans_buf | 1821 ----------- > tests/xfs/082.trans_inode | 2609 --------------- > 24 files changed, 32662 insertions(+), 32662 deletions(-) Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
