On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:04:43PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 06:48:09PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > Add tests for bugs found in ext4 & xfs SEEK_HOLE implementations > > fixed by following patches: > > > > xfs: Fix missed holes in SEEK_HOLE implementation > > ext4: Fix SEEK_HOLE > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > This will cause ext4 and xfs start to fail with current linus tree and > appear as a new regression. So we usually don't add new tests to > existing cases. > > But seek_sanity_test.c deals with different SEEK_DATA/HOLE implentations > nicely, which would be a bit tricky to do in a new test by shell, and it > has all the infrastructures for new tests like this. So I think I'd > prefer merging this patch as is, and document the false regression alert > in release announce email. Make the new tests optional (i.e. on a cli switch) and add a new xfstest that runs them? Old test remains unchanged, doesn't fail, new test covers the new tests, will fail on old kernels (which is ok for new tests). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
