On 4/6/17 10:20 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:51:36AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 04/06/2017 08:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:33:55AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> That is exactly what my recommendation was at lsfmm as well - fork
>>>> xfstest, prune bits we don't need, and off we go. I'll get around to
>>>> it soonish.
>>>
>>> So you volunteer to do it? I was -><- this close to offering it myself,
>>> and than thought of all the other backlog I have on my plate :)
>>
>> Yeah, I'll get something cobbled together next week.
>
> Yay!
>
> But please keep the dependencies small. It'll suck when we'd have to pull in a
> gazillion megabytes for perl/pyhthon/whatever.
Full-blown xfstests doesn't have /that/ much in the way of deps,
on debian it's ostensibly just:
sudo apt-get install xfslibs-dev uuid-dev libtool-bin \
e2fsprogs automake gcc libuuid1 quota attr libattr1-dev make \
libacl1-dev libaio-dev xfsprogs libgdbm-dev gawk fio dbench \
uuid-runtime
and lots of that might not be needed for non-fs tests.
Otherwise well, you do need bash ... ;)
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
