On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:39:42PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:23:58PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Update generic/397 to test another behavior when accessing encrypted > > files without the key: renames should be forbidden, even though they may > > be possible cryptographically. Test both a regular rename and a cross > > rename. (It happens that generic/398 also covers the cross rename case, > > but it's primarily for a different reason.) > > > > Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We usually don't add new tests to existing tests, expecially targeted > regression tests, this could make test start failing and make people > think it's a new regression. > > Would you mind writing a new case for it? > > Thanks, > Eryu I felt that this fit well into the existing test, but yes I'll add a new one if that's preferable. Thanks! - Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
