[PATCH] common/xfs: change _xfs_mkfs_validation_check return logic

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



_xfs_mkfs_validation_check() try to make sure mkfs.xfs the stricter
input checks. It runs two test command lines with illegal parameters:

  $cmd -s size=2s
  $cmd -l version=2,su=260k

The current logic think if both of them return 0 (can't find
illegal input), then it means the current xfsprogs doesn't support
the stricter input checks.

But when test on machine with 4k sector size disk, the first command
will return non-zero, and then _xfs_mkfs_validation_check() return
non-zero to _require_xfs_mkfs_validation(). The latter will assume
xfsprogs support the stricter input checks.

So I think the proper logic should be if "any" of test command lines
return 0, then it means xfsprogs can't do stricter input test.

Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 common/xfs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
index 767a481..0eaa974 100644
--- a/common/xfs
+++ b/common/xfs
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ _xfs_mkfs_validation_check()
 	local sum=$?
 
 	$cmd -l version=2,su=260k >/dev/null 2>&1
-	sum=`expr $sum + $?`
+	sum=`expr $sum \* $?`
 
 	rm -f $tmpfile
 	return $sum
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux