On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 08:58:30AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:15:19PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 02:43:41PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This series is associated with the "buffered write and indlen fixes" > > > series recently posted to the XFS list. These patches move the original > > > test to the XFS directory as it now depends on an XFS-specific > > > mechanism, restore the effectiveness of the original test, and finally > > > enhance the test to reproduce the newly identified problems fixed by the > > > kernel patches. Thoughts, reviews, flames appreciated. > > > > I think it's still worth keeping the original fzero tests in generic, as > > a generic function/regression test, though it's not effective to > > reproduce the original bug. And maybe it's still working and effective > > on some distro kernels? How about just adding a new test for XFS? > > > > Sure, in that case I guess I can just copy generic/033 rather than move > it and then squash these down into a single patch. Any other comments on > the resulting test before I post an update? /me thinks the new test ought to _notrun if the fail_writes file doesn't show up... that said /me is sorta braindead after a lot of travel yesterday and could've missed it already being there. :( --D > > Brian > > > Thanks, > > Eryu > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
