On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Make sure all tests which run fsstress, and which do not have a very
> > specific custom profile of which file system operations to run,
>
> Can you elaborate about this criteria?
> Specifically, what about overlay/019? and several other {xfs,btrfs}/* stress
> tests. Why do they not qualify?
I didn't bother looking at the tests beyond tests/generic, sorry.
The general criteria I used is that fstress invocation didn't specify
any -f options, then I would definitely add a $FSSTRESS_AVOID. If
there was a large number of -f options, then definitely don't add
$FSSTRESS_AVOID. If there are only 2 or 3 -f options, then I'd
probably add $FSSTRESS_AVOID but it's more of a test by test basis.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
