Re: [PATCH] xfs/122: reduce xfs_dsb_t size

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 1/24/17 11:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:08:19AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> We're not going to do reverse-mapping on the realtime device for
>> some time, so let's fix xfs/122 in the meantime.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Looks fine,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Philosophically (I'm good at that) how do we handle tests like this
that really only work on the latest version of the code, but don't
actually indicate a bug if it fails on something older?

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux