Re: [PATCH 4/7] reflink: fix quota tests to work properly

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:05:01PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Fix the reflink quota tests to su to the fsgqa user so that we actually
> test enforcement of quotas.  Seems that XFS enforces user quotas even
> if root is writing to a user file, whereas everything else lets root
> writes through.  Also clean up some of the variable usage and
> _require_user.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Refactor the quota block reporting into a helper function and
> port all the existing tests.  Fix "fsgqa"/$qa_user usage too.
> ---
>  common/quota          |   10 ++++++++++
>  tests/generic/305     |   22 ++++++++++------------
>  tests/generic/305.out |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  tests/generic/326     |   22 ++++++++++------------
>  tests/generic/326.out |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  tests/generic/327     |   19 +++++++++----------
>  tests/generic/327.out |   12 ++++++------
>  tests/generic/328     |   29 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  tests/generic/328.out |   28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  tests/xfs/213         |   22 ++++++++++------------
>  tests/xfs/213.out     |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  tests/xfs/214         |   22 ++++++++++------------
>  tests/xfs/214.out     |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  13 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/common/quota b/common/quota
> index d4ae861..5c6e680 100644
> --- a/common/quota
> +++ b/common/quota
> @@ -302,5 +302,15 @@ _check_quota_usage()
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +# Report the block usage of root, $qa_user, and nobody
> +_report_quota_blocks() {
> +	repquota $SCRATCH_MNT | egrep "^($qa_user|root|nobody)" | awk '{print $1, $3, $4, $5}'
> +}
> +
> +# Report the inode usage of root, $qa_user, and nobody
> +_report_quota_inodes() {
> +	repquota $SCRATCH_MNT | egrep "^($qa_user|root|nobody)" | awk '{print $1, $6, $7, $8}'
> +}
> +

Name them as _scratch_report_quota_blocks|inodes ? Since they're
assuming mount point is SCRATCH_MNT. Or take the mount point as the
first argument?

Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux