On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:11:21PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > XFS kernel code had a bug where GETNEXTQUOTA-type > quotactls requesting an ID near UINT_MAX could overflow > and return 0 as the "next" active ID. > > This test checks that by creating an active quota near > UINT_MAX, then asking for the next one after it. > > The proper answer is ENOENT, but if we wrap we'll return > ID 0. > > This also changes test-nextquota.c so that it checks > both GETNEXTQUOTA and XGETNEXTQUOTA even if one fails; > it stores the failure conditions and returns 1 if either > of them fails. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > V2: cleanups from Eryu's review. > > Eryu - I need to send a _require_getnextquota patch, and some > other cleanups to 244, similar to your review of this test > (I copied this test from 244). > > I'll do that in reply to this patch, hopfully tonight, yet. Thanks, Eric! > +# remount just for kicks, make sure we get it off disk > +_scratch_unmount > +_qmount > +quotaon $SCRATCH_MNT 2>/dev/null I removed this quotaon too and merged. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
