Re: [PATCH 1/2] fstests: common: rename and enhance _require_btrfs to _require_btrfs_subcommand

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]





At 12/08/2016 12:00 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:04:55AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Rename _require_btrfs() to _require_btrfs_subcommand() to avoid
confusion, as all other _require_btrfs_* has a quite clear suffix, like
_require_btrfs_mkfs_feature() or _require_btrfs_fs_feature().

Also enhance _require_btrfs_subcommand() to accept 2nd level commands or
options.
Options will be determined by the first "-" char.
This is quite useful for case like "btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree"
and "btrfs check --qgroup-report".

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 common/rc       | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----

Can you rebase on top of current master please? We've moved
btrfs-specific functions to common/btrfs

Finally!
Good news.


 tests/btrfs/004 |  3 ++-
 tests/btrfs/048 |  2 +-
 tests/btrfs/059 |  2 +-
 tests/btrfs/131 |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
index 8c99306..1703232 100644
--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -3019,15 +3019,34 @@ _require_deletable_scratch_dev_pool()
 }

 # We check for btrfs and (optionally) features of the btrfs command
-_require_btrfs()
+# _require_btrfs_subcommand <subcommand> [<subfunction>|<option>]
+# It can handle both subfunction like "inspect-internal dump-tree"
+# and options like "check --qgroup-report"
+_require_btrfs_subcommand()

I'd prefer a name similar to _require_xfs_io_command, e.g.
_require_btrfs_command, "subcommand" seems not necessary to me.


Right, the subcommand seems not that handy compared to other _require_*.


 {
-	cmd=$1
-	_require_command "$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG" btrfs
 	if [ -z "$1" ]; then
-		return 1;
+		echo "Usage: _require_btrfs_subcommand command [subcommand]" 1>&2
+		exit 1
 	fi
-	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG $cmd --help >/dev/null 2>&1
+	cmd=$1
+	param=$2
+
+	_require_command "$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG" btrfs
+	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG $cmd --help &>/dev/null
 	[ $? -eq 0 ] || _notrun "$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG too old (must support $cmd)"
+
+	test -z "$param" && return
+
+	# if $param is an option, replace leading "-"s for grep
+	if [ ${param:0:1} == "-" ]; then
+		param=$(echo $param | sed 's/^-*//')
+		$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG $cmd --help | grep $param > /dev/null || \

Use "grep -w" to be safer? And "-q" instead of "> /dev/null"

Right, -w is much safer. I'll use "-q" in next version.


+			_not_run "$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG too old (must support $cmd $param)"

$param here is without leading "-", so the _notrun message is kind of
misleading. And _notrun not _not_run :)

Right, I'll using safe_param.

Thanks,
Qu


Thanks,
Eryu




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux