Re: new xfs/103 failure

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 02:31:29AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 08:32:48AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > After recently upgrading the xfs and xfsprogs trees I get reproducible
> > xfs/103 failures because the n flags is not reported.  Does anyone else
> > see this?
> 
> I see xfs/103 hang with latest xfsprogs & xfstests, and after applying
> this xfstests patch xfs/103 passed for me without problem. kernel is
> for-next branch from xfs tree.
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg04308.html
> 
> Not sure if this is related to your problem.

With that patch applies the test passes for me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux