Re: [PATCH] common: add support for the "local" file system type

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 04:05:26PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> It is sometimes useful to be able to test the local file system
> provided in a restricted execution environment (such as that which is
> provided by Docker, for example) where it is not possible to mount and
> unmount the file system under test.

Ignoring the code changes for the moment - what's the reason/use
case for running /kernel/ test suites inside a user container with
such restricted access to filesystems and devices? Especially
considering test failures can take the kernel down, which will kill
/everything/ on the machine, not just the container.

This doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me - who is going to use
this and what extra test coverage does it bring to the table
compared to just running inside a guest VM with full privileges?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux