On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:23:29AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:23:41PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > > btrfs failed to mount small fs on ppc64 host with error ENOSPC, even > > > creating such small fs succeeded, then generic/027 consumed all free > > > space on root fs not on SCRATCH_DEV and test harness cannot create tmp > > > files and continue other tests. > > > > > > Though I think it's a btrfs bug, it's still worth preventing this > > > situation from happening in the harness, as such tests usually aim to > > > exercise fs on ENOSPC conditions, there's no point to continue if the > > > small fs is not mounted. > > > > I think the btrfs bug should be fixed. At minimum, the workaround to > > see if the filesytem can be mounted should be in btrfs's > > implementation of scratch_mkfs_sized.... > > OK, I'll add workaround in _scratch_mkfs_sized. Thanks for reviewing! I think about it another time, I agree that what really should be fixed is the btrfs bug, not fstests. I'll drop this patch and report bug to btrfs list. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
