Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xfstests: btrfs: test device delete with EIO on src dev

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]




 Hi Filipe,


Any reason to not run here fsstress like the test from patch 2? Doing
the device delete with a non-empty fs is a lot more interesting and
can help find bugs and regressions in the future.

  You are reviewing v2. fsstress was added in v4.


Also this test needs the latest btrfs-progs and kernel patch

Not patch, but patch set instead. I was looking for a patch with that
title and didn't found any, only a cover letter with the subject:
"[PATCH 0/8 v2] device delete by devid".

under title
   [PATCH] device delete by devid

 will update comments.

When this patch is not found in the btrfs-progs, this test
will not run. However when the require patch is not found
in the kernel it will fail gracefully.

What's the status of these patches (both kernel and btrfs-progs)? I've
noticed they've been around since april and no feedback on the mailing
list.



Thanks, Anand

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux