Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfstest: generic/219 add _require_odirect

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 08/03/2015 11:59 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:06:54PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
generic/219 is testing quota in three use cases including
Direct I/O. So we have to add a dependence to odirect in
this test.

Hmmm - you've modified on only 2 tests here in this patch series
that use direct IO. There are many more - just looking for direct IO
comments, these generic tests use direct IO in some way, and there
are others that such usage is not obvious (e.g. this patch to
generic/219):

generic/091
generic/113
generic/130
generic/214
generic/224
generic/263
shared/272

And all the aio/dio tests:

generic/036
generic/198
generic/207
generic/208
generic/209
generic/210
generic/211
generic/212
generic/239
generic/240
generic/323

And there are others that run fio that uses DIO, too, like

generic/299
generic/300

And so on. I haven't even looked at all the fsx tests that might
use DIO, and I know that some of them are not listed above...

On the whole, I think ubifs would be better to implement DIO via
buffered fallback that to make us have to annotate every test that
uses DIO in some way...

Fair point. Yes, It's difficult to find out all the tests which would use DIO.

And we are discussing about dio in ubifs.

So if you are strongly rejecting this kind of change, I will drop
this patch in my next version.

Thanx
Yang

Cheers,

Dave.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux