Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: test for false positive reserved attr name use

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 5/14/15 12:44 AM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:23:14AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> All good advice; sigh, I am rusty!  Thanks, will resend with fixes.
>>
>> (Started as using test dev so left some things out; not sure I need a trap if there is nothing to clean up?  Also do we need to require attr on xfs?  Can't remember if we can compile that out, but I guess it's harmless to include it)
> 
> I did a "grep _require_attrs tests/xfs/*" and result showed several
> tests in xfs require attrs. At least it checks if ATTR_PROG exists :)

Yes, I forgot about that ;(

> And I think we need a trap and cleanup even if there's no obvious things
> to clean, some functions use $tmp.xxx internally, a cleanup could remove
> all these tmp files too, and trap plays with exit status, so it's still
> needed.

Fair enough, thanks for the review.

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux