----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Sterba" <dsterba@xxxxxxx> > > I have a proposal for slight modification to the naming scheme: > > NNN-free-text > > where NNN is a unique number among all tests in the same directory. > > Why? Convenience, a shortcut for the long test descriptions. We usually > say that test 123 fails and some other does not, I personally find it > very handy and would like to keep that. > > I've enforced this naming scheme for btrfs-progs userspace tests: > https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/tree/master/tests/fsck-tests > > The preference might be different for others though, but we can still > try to follow the scheme inside the tests/btrfs/ directory. > I see the reason, but I have a note. This format breaks alphabetic ordering, so if we use names for grouping tests together, they are not listed that way. There is an example of what I mean by the grouping: performance/group: fsmark-small-files-001 fsmark small_files rw sequential fsmark-small-files-002 fsmark small_files rw random fsmark-small-files-003 fsmark small_files traverse fsmark-small-files-004 fsmark small_files unlink fsmark-large-files-001 fsmark large_files rw fsmark-large-files-002 fsmark large_files unlink fsmark-1m-empty-files-001 fsmark metadata scale create fsmark-10m-empty-files-001 fsmark metadata scale create fsmark-100m-empty-files-001 fsmark metadata scale create fsmark-100m-empty-files-002 fsmark metadata scale traverse fsmark-100m-empty-files-003 fsmark metadata scale unlink ..... If we put the unique number at the end (some-name-NNN), then this issue is eliminated. Of course, with this you can't do NNN<tab> for completion, but it keeps the number reference. But this way it makes harder to find the test by number... ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 March, 2015 4:20:24 PM > > > Yes, I like that, but then we want to make sure that we do not have > tests with the same numbers, but different name. Also having more more > constrains on the names is a good thing especially when people feel like > being creative with test names. > > So we can make it > > NNN-test-name > > where we only allow numbers in the first three characters, and only > alphabetic ASCII characters and a dash afterwards (or underscore, > whichever you prefer). > > Thanks! > -Lukas The stricter rules are all right, I agree with that too. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
