On 3/20/15 1:56 PM, Zach Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:13:47AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Replace every explicit mount/umount of scratch or test devices >> with helper functions. This allows the next patch to add in hooks >> to these functions in order to set up & tear down overlayfs on >> every mount/umount. > > Yeah, I don't know about this. > > For nfs testing we don't setup xfstests to test xfs on block devices and > then then magically configure nfs to export and mount it on the side. > > Wouldn't we treat overlayfs the same way? It'd be its own fstype whose > underlying resources are fs paths? Yeah, maybe I need to rethink it. TBH, I'm not really clear on how nfs gets set up in fstests, but I guess I should look. Thanks, -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
