On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:31:49PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hello, > > I'm consistently getting failure in xfs/106 test because the files > created by fsstress are just completely different from what they are > expected to be. It almost seems as if the random numbers generated for > fsstress are different. Anyone has seen this as well? If it's not in the auto group, then it's not expected to function as a reliable regression test. There are few tests around the xfs/100 to xfs/130 that fall into this category. Some were tests that were never completed, others were simply a method of exercising the functionality and not intended to have deterministic output and hence "always fail". given the amount of commented out functionality and comments like "# not yet working properly?" in xfs/106 leads me to beleive it falls into the former category of "unfinished". Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
