Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Does someone already have a simple test case we can add to the libaio test > suite to verify this behaviour? Well, we're running into this with xfstests, so we have a unit test that will exit w/o waiting on iocbs. Follow that up with a umount of the fs, and it should be doable in the libaio test harness. I'll cook something up. > I'm assuming that waiting for one ioctx at a time is sufficient and we > don't need to parallelise cancellation at exit. I don't know of any workload that would be adversely affected, for whatever that's worth. Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
