Re: Granular synthetic emboldening possible ?

[Jay Aurabind <jay.aurabind@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 15:04, Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:50 PM Werner LEMBERG <wl@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Uh, oh, bad wording on my side, sorry.  What he's actually after is
> not emboldening per se but asking for *weight* N and wanting
> fontconfig return a font with weight N+5 – ideally without
> emboldening.

Well, if simply wanting to increase a weight in what fontconfig returns:

<match target="font">
  <edit name="weight" mode="assign">
    <plus>
        <name>weight</name>
        <int>5</int>
    </plus>
  </edit>
</match>

will always increase 5 to weight in result for example though, it
won't take any effects on rendering.
Or always wanting to *request* N+5 whether or not exactly finding it out:

<match target="pattern">
  <edit name="weight" mode="assign">
    <plus>
      <name>weight</name>
      <int>5</int>
    </plus>
  </edit>
</match>

I did some experiments with the suggested configuration. I found that not all fonts support granular increase of weights. For instance, FreeSans OTF font has its next width at value 51 (I used the config to request "N+5" suggested by Akira.). Values until 50 have no change on rendering. However, Roboto woff type does not seem to change below or at 51. This expt was under the assumption that OTF types are more "vectorial" than TTF. I did this by rejecting all TTF fonts and explicitly allowing only the folders I want in fonts.conf (Thanks again, Akira, your another thread in fc mailing list helped). The situation is now much better. Simply getting rid of TTF's are giving a sharper looking fonts. Only if it had just a little more weight, it would have hit the sweetspot for me.

So the experiment suggests that no two fonts are created equal, despite being more vectorial by virtue of encoding in OTF format. This begs the question, are there any FreeType Supported font formats that can actually do granular weight rendering if requested by fontconfig? With the config example, I believe fontconfig has done its part of requesting what I need. Now the ball is in Freetype's court? ;) I do remember Werner mentioning about the advanced web fonts that Freetype "allows access to", but for them, the configuration is decided by the browser. This means I need to poke my browser's font rendering mechanism as well. Besides, the systemwide config option I tested did not affect browser's web page rendering. I wish there was one place to tweak them all.

But this may not helps if no such fonts available on system.

Anyway, if modifying a weight takes effects to the rendering, we don't
need emboldeing at all. so...
or am I still misunderstanding requrements here?

I think an appropriate requirement statement is "System-wide granular font base weight adjustment"

>
>
>     Werner



--
Akira TAGOH

--

Thanks and Regards,

Aurabindo J

_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig