On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 01:52:18AM +0900, Masamichi Hosoda wrote: > >> In the near future, if the number of available OTC fonts are grown, > >> this way will become unusable. > > > > Why it is important for you to ignore OTC fonts specifically? > > LilyPond uses fontconfig for finding fonts. > However, LilyPond could not support OTC fonts. > If you use LilyPond with an OTC font, it raises an error. > In order to avoid the error and find other fonts, > it is necessary that OTC fonts are ignored. > > In addition, ghostscript can not handle OTC fonts. > > Current LilyPond has added limited OTC support. > Soon, LilyPond will be added more complete OTC support. > However, it is still limited and ignoring OTC fonts are necessary. Hmm, I’d think it should be trivial for an application that support font collections and CFF-based OpenType fonts to support CFF-based collections, there is nothing fundamentally different here. So it shouldn’t take long time before the few outliers are fixed. Regards, Khaled _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
