Yes, you're right. I'm trying to address that issue in next release as far as possible though, bumping the cache version quickly isn't also a good idea. the value in FC_POSTSCRIPT_NAME itself will not be changed once it's available. so it's not that bad thing to do that this time, without even the match part in the worst case anyway...
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ideally matching on POSTSCRIPT_NAME is what PDF viewers want ,so it would beOn 02/05/2013 03:57 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In next release, some new objects will be added to the cache and planning to
> bump the cache version due to that. as I posted before, regarding to this, I
> have one more plan to add new object, FC_POSTSCRIPT_NAME (too long?) into the
> cache. it may be a good time to do so during this breakage. that said, I
> haven't yet addressed all of issues around it. so I won't update the matcher
> this time because not giving any effects to the score.
>
> any comments?
rather useless without the match part.
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Akira TAGOH
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
