Re: RFC: adding a tool to validate the glyph coverage in a font

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah, I just realized now I missed the doc for that. sure. will add it.

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12-12-20 01:57 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
>> Hi Behdad,
>>
>> Yes, that's true. in fact It doesn't include fcint.h but the commit
>> contains the change of fcint.h because FcLangNormalize() needs to be
>> public.
>
> Then, yes, that function needs to be public (in a proper form).
>
> behdad
>
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 12-12-20 01:37 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm planning to add a small tool to check if a font has sufficient
>>>> coverage for certain language to display. if anyone is interested in,
>>>> you can check it out from
>>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tagoh/fontconfig/?h=bz29312 and try.
>>>>
>>>> comments are welcome.
>>>
>>> Hi Akira,
>>>
>>> Please rewrite the tool without including fcint.h.  Tools are supposed to use
>>> public API only.  This will ensure that third-party tools can perform the same
>>> operations done by FC cmdline tools.
>>>
>>> behdad
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> behdad
> http://behdad.org/



-- 
Akira TAGOH
_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Graphics Editor]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux