Behdad, thank you for triggering the discussion on ISO CFR. Also I'm interested in the discussion about which existing library is the most appropriate place to support ISO Composite Font Representation, or, new library is required. In the earliest phase of ISO CFR discussion in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 font AHG, the object created by one CFR was expected to be looking like as a single font face object (and the client is not required to care if it is from single font file, or composite font). In my understanding, fontconfig does not provide a font face "object", so new thin layer above fontconfig & freetype is expected. Unfortunately, Werner Lemberg is now traveling and almost offline from the internet, so please wait August for his comment. Regards, mpsuzuki Akira TAGOH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Any interest in implementing these natively? Would be handy as syntax for >> combining Droid families, etc also. > > Yes, interesting idea to address the sort of that issue. I'll have a > look into it later. thanks for sharing the information. > > Cheers, > >> https://blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2012/05/breaking-64k-glyph-barrier.html >> https://blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2012/05/all-unicode-cfr.html >> >> Matching algorithms need to be changed slightly, but nothing major I would say. >> >> behdad >> _______________________________________________ >> Fontconfig mailing list >> Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig > > > _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
