On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (Don't you hate when you spot the mistakes in your e-mail as soon as it > arrives back in your inbox? I did mention not testing either suggestion, > right?) any suggestions and pointing my mistake out is always welcome :) > Actually, since we continue looping, probably don't want to free(f), > so that we can just use it the next time through - if you do free it, > then f needs to be set to NULL to avoid double free, and flen needs > to be reset to 0 so we start the allocation anew on the next loop. Maybe just not using malloc would be easier? anyway I'll fix them soon. -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig