Re: fc-cache succeeds, but fc-list still gives empty result on Wine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-09-19 17:22-0400 Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

On 09/19/11 16:41, Alan W. Irwin wrote:

Anybody here have a clue why fc-list gives empty results under these
circumstances where fc-cache appears to be succeeding?

You gave a path to fc-cache.  fc-list doesn't have that path.  You need to
figure out where the fonts.conf lies in that setting and add the correct font
path in there.  Something along those lines.  Or read fontconfig source code
to see what it does on Windows....

Hi Behdad:

Thanks for your help which lead me to the solution.

What initially confused me was The fc-cache man page which says

"A cache is created which contains properties of each font and the
associated filename."

So I assumed that meant the full path name, but after reading your
remarks above I used fc-cat to access information in some of those
cache files.  It appears the cache simply identifies the filename
without path consistent with what you said.  So that filename is a
useful identifier for the font but not useful for actually helping
fontconfig to find where that font file is located (!)

I therefore pursued your idea of modifying the system fonts.conf which
on my system is located at $prefix/gtkplus-2.22.1/etc/fonts/fonts.conf,
where prefix is the directory where I unpacked the all-in-one Windows
binary for GTK+.

This patch to that file worked.

--- fonts.conf.original 2010-02-05 12:55:42.000000000 -0800
+++ fonts.conf  2011-09-19 15:58:14.000000000 -0700
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@

 <!-- Font directory list -->

+       <dir>z:/usr/share/fonts</dir>
        <dir>WINDOWSFONTDIR</dir>
-
        <dir>~/.fonts</dir>

 <!--

Note, that drive-letter form was essential.  MSYS-bash also honors the
alternative /z/usr/share/fonts form specifying the full path to the
file, but that form does not work in the above file.

After the above change, under wine I ran

"fc-cache" with no options, and after that "fc-list" gave lots of
results, and my test applications for libLASi worked fine as well.

So thanks very much for your essential help that lead me to the
solution, but I do feel editing an installed system file like $prefix/gtkplus-2.22.1/etc/fonts/fonts.conf has the feel of a
workaround for a fontconfig issue that should be addressed to make it
easier for users to specify alternative font locations on Windows
platforms such as Wine.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________
_______________________________________________
Fontconfig mailing list
Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Graphics Editor]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux