|
Sacrificing collaboration because of the spammers (moving to static pages) seems undesirable :( Are there options to make it more secure? Improving security is probably a good investment. (^_^)/ mike. > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:17:33 -0800 > From: alan.coopersmith@xxxxxxxxxx > To: fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: freedesktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Time to kill the fontconfig wiki? > > Looking at http://www.fontconfig.org/wiki/TitleIndex I see it's around > 99.9% pure spam. Other than the front page, virtually everything else > is the moin-moin boilerplate or the hundreds of pages of spam. Even the > Recent Changes & Find Page links have been overwritten by spammers hundreds > of times, with the spammers fighting each other to crap on it most recently. > (I restored them both this week, but expect that to not last long.) > > Would fontconfig be better served by a static web page? (Maybe even one > with, dare I say it, nice fonts?) Or should the wiki just be purged and > set up fresh with greater levels of access control? > > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@xxxxxxxxxx > Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System > > _______________________________________________ > Fontconfig mailing list > Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig |
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
