On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Qianqian Fang <fangq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/15/2010 04:36 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >> Hence I'd like to classify the rough prefixes for stakeholders: >> 000~199 ... reserved area of fontconfig upstream for minimal sets of >> the configurations >> such as: 10-*.conf, 50-user.conf and so on >> any configuration files that contains the specific font >> names shouldn't be put in this area. >> 300~499 ... reserved area of the system administrators >> 600~799 ... reserved area of the distributors >> 900~ ... reserved area of fontconfig upstream for convenience >> configurations >> >> > > why not make the numeric prefix a float? > > the proposed approach only expand the name space by 10x, > but accepting floating numbers can expand it at least > 10^7x~10^8x, and will still be compatible with the > existing structure (I assume the changes to the code > will also be minimal). Sure. if so much namespaces are really necessary. from my experience, it may depends how many fallbacks are needed. I guess two or three may be enough? so just thought 2 digits namespaces may be sufficient for stakeholders. > > Qianqian > -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
