On 12/09/2009 01:16 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > Twas brillig at 13:12:44 09.12.2009 UTC-05 when behdad@xxxxxxxxxx did gyre and gimble: > > BE> But why would someone cache fonts on an SD card from a Linux > BE> system? > > Due to precisely same reason why there is ~/.fonts in typical fontconfig > setup. > > BE> If the whole system is on the SD card, it's definitely not FAT. > > No, it's not. It's the user-accessible part of device, like $HOME on > PC. Thanks to one OS the only sane choice FS for SD cards is FAT. Still not convinced. > BE> I don't think we have to handle that case. > > Then I will have to keep my patch outside of main tree. What a wonderful > idea! I said I don't think we *have* to. Not that I'm opposing it if it's implemented generically using statfs for example. behdad _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
