Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Check fontconfig/fc-arch/fcarch.tmpl.h. It just means that armel and > mipsel have the same signature (which is hardly surprising). If you > have a better name for the platform, toss it NOW and I'll change it in > 2.8 (since the cache version is changed). It's not a big deal. I've given it a few minutes of thought and can't think of a better name. I would hate to give it some combined name only to find that any number of other architectures have the same signature. But it's good to know that it's an issue of naming as opposed to being erroneously detected. > And, you were not cross-compiling, right? No, not cross-compiling. Native compilation is the way to go, IMO. --Pat _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
