On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:37:06PM +0200, Patrick Lam wrote: > Albert Chin wrote: > > $ cd fc-arch > > # ./fc-arch auto < fcarch.tmpl.h > > ... > > #define FC_ARCHITECTURE "ppc" > > > > So, it seems fc-arch believes Solaris/SPARC (32-bit) has the same > > signature as "ppc". Ditto for HP-UX/PA and HP-UX/IA. And, for AIX, > > fc-arch thinks the architecture is "m68k". And, for Tru64 UNIX, > > fc-arch thinks the architecture is "x86-64". > > > > So, is fc-arch checking too little to discern one architecture from > > another? > > In principle if the arches have the same signature they should create > compatible cache files. Please mail the list if this isn't the case. Agreed. But it'll seem odd to have "ppc" signature files in ~/.fontconfig on a Solaris/SPARC host. Ditto for "m68k" signature files on a AIX host. Maybe non-platform names should be chosen instead. -- albert chin (china@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
