On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 14:54 -0500, James Cloos wrote: > >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Keith> No, the full adobe glyph set has never been a part of > Keith> fontconfig as I haven't ever seen a need. Fontconfig only uses > Keith> this table for fonts with adobe_custom encoding; the only ones > Keith> I've seen like this are the decorative glyph fonts. Do you have > Keith> a font which requires this data? > > I don't know whether it requires the data, but URW's Symbol will not > cache when FC_GLYPHNAME_MAXLEN is too small for the font's glyphnames. That shouldn't matter; can you explain where in the code the limit is causing a problem? As far as I know, the code compares font glyph names with those in the static table, so font glyph names longer than the largest pre-defined glyph name should not cause any problem. If that's not true, we should just fix the code; it's a bug that you are masking by adding piles of data to the library. -- keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
