On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 00:34 -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:09:50AM +0100, Keith Packard wrote: > > I'm wondering if we shouldn't use a /tmp scheme as a part of the cache > > directory path. Would this make sense, and if so, how would we structure > > the names? > > I'd suggest a /tmp/.fc-cache/[whatever]. On systems with _lots_ of > logged in users, this wouldn't flood /tmp with an entry for every > user. that generates issues with symlink attacks as we discovered with /tmp/.X11-unix; without some caution; before we do this, I'd like a reasonably detailed description of how these files and directories could be built safely. -- keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
