Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> ????????: > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 01:38 +0100, Mike FABIAN wrote: > >> Shortly after I wrote my last mail I also thought about symbol >> fonts and thought that they would probably be skipped as well with >> my patch. But strangely enough they are still listed by fc-list >> and can still be used: > > Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if Adobe symbol fonts provided Unicode > mappings for their glyphs. I'm sure there are other custom fonts which > don't though, like maybe the LaTeX math fonts. I just don't want to skip > legit fonts, I only want to skip bogus bitmaps. > > Perhaps we can just use the presense of some BDF properties to detect > BDF-derived non-Unicode bitmap fonts? How to do that? I guess something like the original test for pcf fonts without using freetype internals is not possible. Or is it? -- Mike FABIAN <mfabian@xxxxxxx> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian ?????????????
