On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 23:04 -0500, Patrick Lam wrote: > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > It would indeed solve both problems simultaneously. > > Maybe, for performance, would it be better to > > use /var/cache/fontconfig/$hash.cache files, $hash being generated from > > the original pathname ? > > How does the attached patch look? Is fontconfig supposed to be > responsible for creating /var/cache/fontconfig, or can it rely on the > packager? Also is hardcoding /var/cache/fontconfig the right thing? You want to use a cryptographically secure hash to avoid collisions, as long as you survive collisions, you can use MD5, SHA1 or SHA256 as you please. -keith -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20051206/c0174a87/attachment.pgp
