On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 15:51 -0400, Patrick Lam wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Just trying this again, it worked when copying an x86_64 cache to a i386 > > machine. Let me try the other way around again. I notice though, that > > FcDirCacheValid() needs to become a bit smarter. It should not consider > > a cache valid if it doesn't contain a section for the current platform. > > Otherwise, fc-cache may fail to add a section for the current plaform, > > since the cache file appears uptodate, timestamp-wise. > > Great. It ought to work the other way, if it works one way. But let me > know what you find out. > > Good catch on FcDirCacheValid. I've just committed a fix for that which > will be in 2.3.92. (Your mail arrived just a minute after I posted > 2.3.91. Oh well.) Could you test that out too? > Seems to work both ways now. Matthias
