On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 22:51 -0400, Patrick Lam wrote: > On my system, my modified version of fontconfig mmaps 147786 bytes > into memory (instead of creating around 100k of dynamic data > structures). I believe that this patch is stable; it produces no > differences in behaviour as compared to a stock fontconfig under > my tests. I haven't looked at the patch in detail, so some of these questions may actually make incorrect assumptions. 1) What happens if you can't mmap the cache files at the necessary address? 2) Different users have different sets of font directories. Does this patch support that? 3) What about the new <selectfont> elements? These may also vary for different users. -keith -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20050609/cb526961/attachment.pgp