Around 13 o'clock on Oct 13, Owen Taylor wrote: > What I'm talking about is that FcFontSort() results potentially depend > upon the pixel size. This makes caching both much more expensive and > much less effective. Depending *less* on pixel size doesn't help with > that. Hmm. It might be useful to know when the FcFontSort isn't dependent on the font size; I think that will be true a lot of the time. -keith -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/fontconfig/attachments/20041013/06736ff7/attachment.pgp
