On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 11:40, Dan Egnor wrote:
> > By default, only X font directories containing outlines are included
> > in fonts.conf now; the bitmap fonts are generally more of an annoyance
> > than a help.
>
> Eep. What about everyone's favorite, misc-fixed? I hate to have to
> tell users that they have to mess with their system configuration (or
> install a ~/.fonts.conf) to get the full complement of X11 fonts.
Red Hat ships a special bitmap-fonts package which installs
a small set of selected bitmap fonts in /usr/share/fonts
(misc-fixed and lucidasanstypewriter)
> In what way are the bitmap fonts an annoyance?
* It's really confusing/bad if bitmap helvetica (etc.) are
in the set of fonts you are matching against.
* The bitmap fonts don't necessarily fall into nice families.
* A lot of the bitmap fonts just clutter up the list of fonts,
and aren't anything that a user would want to select.
(open look cursor would be an extreme example.)
* Plus the bitmap fonts in the X11 font directories are
.pcf.gz, the .gz backend in FreeType isn't really mature
yet, and is always going to be slow.
Regards,
Owen
