Re: blog post on fio write zeroes performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/5/24 15:02, Adam Horshack wrote:
Nice writeup Vincent. It's been a while since I've looked at the NVMe spec so perhaps I'm asking the wrong question but why is fio managing a data buffer for its handling of the Write Zero command? I would've assumed there's no data payload associated with that NVMe command, thus nothing that should even be subject to internal buffer scrambling inside fio.

Regards,

Adam


________________________________________
From: Vincent Fu <vincentfu@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 2:41 PM
To: fio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gost.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: blog post on fio write zeroes performance

I am pleased to share a blog post about fio write zeroes performance:

https://github.com/vincentkfu/fio-blog/wiki/How-could-write-zeroes-performance-be-worse-at-higher-queue-depths

Read about the unexpected performance issue we encountered. Feedback is
welcome.

Vincent



When we added write zeroes support for the io_uring_cmd ioengine it was not on our mind that the default behavior for fio is to scramble buffers. Basically these patches just changed the opcode from a regular write to write zeroes.

You do have a good point that perhaps fio should be smart enough to avoid touching the buffers when doing write zeroes.

Thanks for the feedback!

Vincent




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux