On 9/26/24 13:48, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 9/25/24 6:41 PM, Minwoo Im wrote:
diff --git a/io_u.h b/io_u.h
index ab93d50f967e..20afad667ee1 100644
--- a/io_u.h
+++ b/io_u.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ enum {
IO_U_F_BARRIER = 1 << 6,
IO_U_F_VER_LIST = 1 << 7,
IO_U_F_PATTERN_DONE = 1 << 8,
+ IO_U_F_DEVICE_ERROR = 1 << 9,
};
/*
The patches you sent should've been a series, how are they supposed to
both apply when you add an item here for each of them as if the other
one doesn't exist?
I'll fix it up, but for the future, if patches depend on each other, it
should be a series. Please check if everything works when it's pushed
out, which should be shortly.
And since I'm on a plane and this doesn't appear to want to send, when
you do see it, please also add HOWTO additions similar to the fio.1
additions you made.
Also, Minwoo, we are seeing some build failures with your patches with
compilers rejecting abs(io_u->error) since error is unsigned. Please fix
that up as well.
I do have a bot that automatically runs mailing list patches through our
CI, but it does not report the results to the list and I am not always
quick enough to manually report CI failures:
https://github.com/fiotestbot/fio/actions
Vincent
