On Sep 03, 2021 / 06:38, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 9/3/21 2:37 AM, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote: > > diff --git a/options.c b/options.c > > index 8c2ab7cc..3fe1e6bd 100644 > > --- a/options.c > > +++ b/options.c > > @@ -3688,6 +3688,20 @@ struct fio_option fio_options[FIO_MAX_OPTS] = { > > }, > > .parent = "thinktime", > > }, > > + { > > + .name = "thinktime_iotime", > > + .lname = "Thinktime interval", > > + .type = FIO_OPT_INT, > > + .off1 = offsetof(struct thread_options, thinktime_iotime), > > + .help = "IO time interval between 'thinktime'", > > + .is_time = 1, > > + .is_seconds = 1, > > + .def = "0", > > + .parent = "thinktime", > > + .hide = 1, > > + .category = FIO_OPT_C_IO, > > + .group = FIO_OPT_G_THINKTIME, > > + }, > > Please line these up nicely as is done elsewhere. Ah, the order of the members are diffferent from others. I will move a few members to make the order same as others. > > Apart from that, this looks fine. Could really use an example job > though, and an improvement in the explanation. The commit message looks > great, but then the doc additions are pretty lackluster. Maybe steal a > bit of the text you wrote from the commit message and put it in the > shipped documentation? I will improve the descriptions of the new option in fio.1 and HOWTO, copying some of the commit message. Also I will add "for example" option usage in the descriptions. Thank you for your review. -- Best Regards, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki