[QUESTION] Incorrect arguments for FIO job?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi folks - could use some help as I'm not a fio expert....

Short version is an external team is presenting results to me that I don't entirely believe. The resulting IOPS & Throughput for 'random read' and 'random write' are exactly the same, which makes no logical sense.  I'm concerned they have a problem with the arguments used in FIO; especially as I notice a typo.

Here is what's being run:
fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --sync=1  --name=fio-test --filename=random_50read_50write-.fio  --overwrite=1 --iodepth=64 --size=1GB --readrite=randrw --rwmixread=50 --rwmixwrite=50 --bs=16k --runtime=60 --time_based --ramp_time=15  --percentage_random=50

Note typo "readRite...."   But a lot of these arguments seem redundant.   Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux